Study

Curated
Richardson et al., 2012
Population Genomics of the Wolbachia Endosymbiont in Drosophila melanogaster
[10.1371/journal.pgen.1003129][FBrf0220355]

Description

This study provides a complete genomic analysis of the evolutionary mode and temporal dynamics of the Drosophila melanogaster–Wolbachia symbiosis. The authors used whole-genome resequencing data from 290 lines to predict Wolbachia infection status, estimate relative cytoplasmic genome copy number, and reconstruct Wolbachia and mitochondrial genome sequences. Overall, 63% of Drosophila strains were predicted to be infected with Wolbachia by the authors' in silico analysis pipeline, which shows 99% concordance with infection status determined by diagnostic PCR.

Comments from curator

Phenotyping data comes from Dataset S1 in the Supporting information section.

Of note, this study uses both flies from the DGRP (174 lines) and flies from the Drosophila Population Genomics Project (DPGP). Of course, we only extracted data corresponding to the 174 DGRP lines.
The Wolbachia infection status is a binary value, compatible with PLINK, i.e. values can be 1 (not infected) or 2 (infected)..
I did not know if I should remove some "phenotypes", like the number of reads mapping to the mitochondrial genome, as this looks more like QC than phenotypes. But it could also be seen as a quantitative trait to some extent, so I've kept them for now.

Interestingly, predicted results are strictly equivalent to the ones in (Huang et al, 2014), but somewhat slightly discordant with PCR results.

Other external data available

SRP000694 Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) of 192 DGRP lines

174 DGRP lines 7 unavailable 157 available 10 genotyped

DGRP_021 DGRP_026 DGRP_028 DGRP_038 DGRP_040 DGRP_041 DGRP_042 DGRP_045 DGRP_049 DGRP_057 DGRP_059 DGRP_069 DGRP_073 DGRP_075 DGRP_083 DGRP_085 DGRP_088 DGRP_091 DGRP_093 DGRP_101 DGRP_105 DGRP_109 DGRP_129 DGRP_136 DGRP_138 DGRP_142 DGRP_149 DGRP_153 DGRP_158 DGRP_161 DGRP_176 DGRP_177 DGRP_181 DGRP_195 DGRP_208 DGRP_217 DGRP_227 DGRP_228 DGRP_229 DGRP_233 DGRP_235 DGRP_237 DGRP_239 DGRP_256 DGRP_272 DGRP_280 DGRP_287 DGRP_303 DGRP_306 DGRP_307 DGRP_309 DGRP_310 DGRP_313 DGRP_315 DGRP_317 DGRP_318 DGRP_320 DGRP_321 DGRP_324 DGRP_325 DGRP_332 DGRP_335 DGRP_336 DGRP_338 DGRP_350 DGRP_352 DGRP_356 DGRP_357 DGRP_358 DGRP_359 DGRP_360 DGRP_362 DGRP_365 DGRP_367 DGRP_370 DGRP_371 DGRP_373 DGRP_374 DGRP_375 DGRP_377 DGRP_378 DGRP_379 DGRP_380 DGRP_381 DGRP_383 DGRP_386 DGRP_391 DGRP_392 DGRP_393 DGRP_398 DGRP_399 DGRP_405 DGRP_406 DGRP_409 DGRP_426 DGRP_427 DGRP_437 DGRP_439 DGRP_440 DGRP_441 DGRP_443 DGRP_461 DGRP_486 DGRP_491 DGRP_492 DGRP_502 DGRP_508 DGRP_509 DGRP_513 DGRP_514 DGRP_517 DGRP_531 DGRP_535 DGRP_554 DGRP_555 DGRP_563 DGRP_589 DGRP_591 DGRP_595 DGRP_639 DGRP_642 DGRP_646 DGRP_703 DGRP_705 DGRP_707 DGRP_712 DGRP_714 DGRP_716 DGRP_721 DGRP_727 DGRP_730 DGRP_732 DGRP_737 DGRP_738 DGRP_757 DGRP_761 DGRP_765 DGRP_774 DGRP_776 DGRP_783 DGRP_786 DGRP_787 DGRP_790 DGRP_796 DGRP_799 DGRP_801 DGRP_802 DGRP_804 DGRP_805 DGRP_808 DGRP_810 DGRP_812 DGRP_818 DGRP_820 DGRP_822 DGRP_832 DGRP_837 DGRP_852 DGRP_853 DGRP_855 DGRP_857 DGRP_859 DGRP_861 DGRP_879 DGRP_882 DGRP_884 DGRP_887 DGRP_890 DGRP_892 DGRP_894 DGRP_897 DGRP_907 DGRP_908 DGRP_911

Datasets

Dataset Phenotypes DGRP lines
Summary dataset 23 phenotypes
Mitochon_Breadth_Cov Mitochon_Consens_Dif Mitochon_Consens_Len Mitochon_Depth_Cov Mitochon_Hap_COI2160 Mitochon_Hap_COI2187 Mitochon_Haplotype Mitochon_Mapped_Read Mitochondrial_Clade Nuclear_Breadth_Cov Nuclear_Consensu_Dif Nuclear_Consensu_Len Nuclear_Depth_Cov Nuclear_Mapped_Reads Reads_Total Total_Number_bp Wolbachi_Breadth_Cov Wolbachi_Consens_Dif Wolbachi_Consens_Len WolbachiaStatus WolbachiaStatus_PCR Wolbachia_Depth_Cov Wolbachia_Map_Reads
174 DGRP lines
DGRP_049
DGRP_158
DGRP_233
DGRP_237
DGRP_272
DGRP_325
DGRP_367
DGRP_378
DGRP_393
DGRP_398
DGRP_514
DGRP_554
DGRP_591
DGRP_642
DGRP_727
DGRP_887
DGRP_894
Download
Back to studies