Study

Curated
Akhund-Zade et al., 2021
Genetic basis of offspring number–body weight tradeoff in Drosophila melanogaster
[10.1093/g3journal/jkab129]

Description

Offspring number and mean offspring wet weight (daughters and sons) were measured per vial for 143 DGRP lines, and six lines were also tested at five parental densities. An offspring index (first principal component of the four traits) captured a tradeoff between offspring number and weight.

Comments from curator

Phenotyping data come from the authors' companion data page (de Bivort lab), also archived on Zenodo (DGRP_Offspring_DataCode_Upload_v2.zip):
- DGRP_Screen_Data.csv: daily eclosion records of the DGRP screen (number and weight of the females and males eclosed per vial and day), used for raw dataset 1.
- Line_Effects_Data.csv and pca_phenotype.csv: per-line values modelled by the authors and the offspring index used for their GWAS, used for the summary dataset.
- Density_Data_Records.csv: daily records of the parental density experiment, used for raw dataset 2.

Raw dataset 1 (screen, 143 lines): one row per vial and offspring sex. For each line, 10 females and 5 males (2-5 days old) laid eggs for 2 days at 23 °C in each of 3 vials; the adult offspring were counted and weighed every day for 10 days from the start of eclosion. The sex column is the sex of the offspring. OffspringNum is the total number of offspring of that sex eclosed from the vial, and OffspringWt their mean wet weight in mg, computed as in the authors' script ModelingPhenotypes.R (mean of the daily mean weights; the male weight is the total weight minus the female weight). Following the authors, vials with fewer than 5 females or 5 males (or a zero weight) were excluded, then lines left with a single vial: 32 of the 452 vials and 11 of the 154 lines tested (DGRP_048, 142, 317, 502, 642, 790, 852, 861, 884, 890 and 908) are therefore not included. The remaining 420 vials match the authors' Raw_Line_Phenotypes.csv exactly (values recomputed at full precision from the daily records).

The lines were tested in two batches (Batch and Vial are kept as obsolete design phenotypes): after the filters above, 134 lines have vials in batch 1 (September 2015) and 44 in batch 2 (October 2015), 35 of them in both, as in the paper (batch 2 repeated the lines without three completed vials in batch 1). The raw values are not batch-corrected. The authors corrected batch 2 by subtracting from all its vials the mean difference between the two batches over the 35 shared lines (-17.4 females, -22.3 males, +0.134 mg female weight, +0.119 mg male weight), which reproduces their Batch_Adjusted_Line_Phenotypes.csv.

Summary dataset: mn_OffspringNumAuth and mn_OffspringWtAuth are the authors' per-line values (Line_Effects_Data.csv): values fitted by random-intercept mixed models on the batch-corrected vials (linear model for the counts, gamma model with log link for the weights), averaged per line; they are the values the authors submitted to the DGRP2 webtool for their single-trait GWAS. They differ from the means computed by DGRPool from raw dataset 1 (batch correction and shrinkage; r = 0.93-0.97, differences up to 28 flies or 0.25 mg), which is why both are provided. mn_OffspringIndex (sex NA) is the offspring index used for the GWAS (pca_phenotype.csv): the score of each line on the first principal component (71% of the variance) of these four scaled values. It is negatively loaded for the offspring numbers and positively for the weights: a negative index means many light offspring, a positive index few heavy offspring.

Raw dataset 2 (parental density, 6 lines): six lines chosen for their offspring index (DGRP_176, 237, 350, 049, 812 and 894) laid eggs at five parental densities: 1 female + 1 male (Dens1), 5 + 1 (Dens2), 10 + 5 (Dens3), 25 + 10 (Dens4) and 50 + 20 (Dens5); the offspring were counted and weighed every day for 25 days. One row per replicate vial and offspring sex; the replicates of the different densities are independent and are placed side by side (row k holds the k-th replicate of each density). There are 2 to 7 replicates per line and density, and none for DGRP_894 at density 5. OffspringWt is NA when no offspring of that sex eclosed. The authors' file codes the lines 1 to 6; they were mapped with the authors' script DensityAnalysis.R (1 = RAL 176, 2 = RAL 237, 3 = RAL 350, 4 = RAL 49, 5 = RAL 812, 6 = RAL 894), which follows the order of their offspring index as described in the paper. The paper's methods name RAL 327 instead of RAL 237, which is a typo: RAL 327 was not screened, and RAL 237 has the index of -2.9 given in the paper.

Of note, a few daily records of the screen have implausible mean weights (-0.08 mg for the males of DGRP_362 vial 2 on 2015-09-13, where the total weight is lower than the female weight; 0.27 mg for females and 2.37 mg for males of DGRP_235 vial 2 on 2015-09-15; 2.53 mg for males of DGRP_787 vial 1 of batch 2). They are kept, as in the authors' vial values.

Datasets

Dataset Phenotypes DGRP lines
Summary dataset 3 phenotypes
mn_OffspringIndex mn_OffspringNumAuth mn_OffspringWtAuth
143 DGRP lines
DGRP_026
DGRP_038
DGRP_040
DGRP_045
DGRP_049
DGRP_057
DGRP_059
DGRP_069
DGRP_073
DGRP_083
DGRP_085
DGRP_088
DGRP_091
DGRP_093
DGRP_101
DGRP_105
DGRP_109
DGRP_129
DGRP_136
DGRP_138
DGRP_149
DGRP_153
DGRP_161
DGRP_176
DGRP_177
DGRP_181
DGRP_195
DGRP_217
DGRP_223
DGRP_229
DGRP_233
DGRP_235
DGRP_237
DGRP_256
DGRP_280
DGRP_287
DGRP_301
DGRP_304
DGRP_306
DGRP_307
DGRP_309
DGRP_310
DGRP_315
DGRP_318
DGRP_319
DGRP_320
DGRP_321
DGRP_324
DGRP_332
DGRP_335
DGRP_336
DGRP_338
DGRP_340
DGRP_350
DGRP_352
DGRP_356
DGRP_357
DGRP_358
DGRP_359
DGRP_360
DGRP_361
DGRP_362
DGRP_365
DGRP_367
DGRP_370
DGRP_373
DGRP_374
DGRP_377
DGRP_379
DGRP_380
DGRP_381
DGRP_382
DGRP_383
DGRP_385
DGRP_386
DGRP_391
DGRP_392
DGRP_399
DGRP_405
DGRP_406
DGRP_409
DGRP_426
DGRP_427
DGRP_437
DGRP_439
DGRP_440
DGRP_441
DGRP_443
DGRP_461
DGRP_486
DGRP_491
DGRP_492
DGRP_508
DGRP_513
DGRP_530
DGRP_535
DGRP_555
DGRP_563
DGRP_584
DGRP_589
DGRP_595
DGRP_646
DGRP_703
DGRP_707
DGRP_712
DGRP_714
DGRP_716
DGRP_721
DGRP_730
DGRP_732
DGRP_737
DGRP_738
DGRP_761
DGRP_765
DGRP_774
DGRP_776
DGRP_783
DGRP_786
DGRP_787
DGRP_796
DGRP_799
DGRP_802
DGRP_804
DGRP_805
DGRP_808
DGRP_812
DGRP_819
DGRP_821
DGRP_822
DGRP_837
DGRP_843
DGRP_849
DGRP_850
DGRP_855
DGRP_859
DGRP_879
DGRP_882
DGRP_892
DGRP_894
DGRP_897
DGRP_900
DGRP_907
DGRP_913
Download
Raw dataset #1 2 phenotypes
OffspringNum OffspringWt
143 DGRP lines
DGRP_026
DGRP_038
DGRP_040
DGRP_045
DGRP_049
DGRP_057
DGRP_059
DGRP_069
DGRP_073
DGRP_083
DGRP_085
DGRP_088
DGRP_091
DGRP_093
DGRP_101
DGRP_105
DGRP_109
DGRP_129
DGRP_136
DGRP_138
DGRP_149
DGRP_153
DGRP_161
DGRP_176
DGRP_177
DGRP_181
DGRP_195
DGRP_217
DGRP_223
DGRP_229
DGRP_233
DGRP_235
DGRP_237
DGRP_256
DGRP_280
DGRP_287
DGRP_301
DGRP_304
DGRP_306
DGRP_307
DGRP_309
DGRP_310
DGRP_315
DGRP_318
DGRP_319
DGRP_320
DGRP_321
DGRP_324
DGRP_332
DGRP_335
DGRP_336
DGRP_338
DGRP_340
DGRP_350
DGRP_352
DGRP_356
DGRP_357
DGRP_358
DGRP_359
DGRP_360
DGRP_361
DGRP_362
DGRP_365
DGRP_367
DGRP_370
DGRP_373
DGRP_374
DGRP_377
DGRP_379
DGRP_380
DGRP_381
DGRP_382
DGRP_383
DGRP_385
DGRP_386
DGRP_391
DGRP_392
DGRP_399
DGRP_405
DGRP_406
DGRP_409
DGRP_426
DGRP_427
DGRP_437
DGRP_439
DGRP_440
DGRP_441
DGRP_443
DGRP_461
DGRP_486
DGRP_491
DGRP_492
DGRP_508
DGRP_513
DGRP_530
DGRP_535
DGRP_555
DGRP_563
DGRP_584
DGRP_589
DGRP_595
DGRP_646
DGRP_703
DGRP_707
DGRP_712
DGRP_714
DGRP_716
DGRP_721
DGRP_730
DGRP_732
DGRP_737
DGRP_738
DGRP_761
DGRP_765
DGRP_774
DGRP_776
DGRP_783
DGRP_786
DGRP_787
DGRP_796
DGRP_799
DGRP_802
DGRP_804
DGRP_805
DGRP_808
DGRP_812
DGRP_819
DGRP_821
DGRP_822
DGRP_837
DGRP_843
DGRP_849
DGRP_850
DGRP_855
DGRP_859
DGRP_879
DGRP_882
DGRP_892
DGRP_894
DGRP_897
DGRP_900
DGRP_907
DGRP_913
Download
Raw dataset #2 10 phenotypes
OffspringNum_Dens1 OffspringNum_Dens2 OffspringNum_Dens3 OffspringNum_Dens4 OffspringNum_Dens5 OffspringWt_Dens1 OffspringWt_Dens2 OffspringWt_Dens3 OffspringWt_Dens4 OffspringWt_Dens5
6 DGRP lines
DGRP_049
DGRP_176
DGRP_237
DGRP_350
DGRP_812
DGRP_894
Download
Back to studies